Legal Opinion

Strawn v. Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 20, 2009No. 990809080; A131605PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

This class action arises out of defendants’ claims handling process with respect to the payment of personal injury protection (PIP) benefits to their insureds. In short, defendants Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon, Mid-Century Insurance Company, and Truck Insurance Exchange (collectively, “Farmers”) used cost-containment software to evaluate their insureds’ medical expenses in relation to other bills for the same procedure in a given region. If Farmers determined that the charge submitted by an insured’s provider exceeded a certain percentage of the range of the charges in those other…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Village at North Pointe Condominiums Ass'n v. Bloedel Construction Co.Lincoln County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  5. Wieber v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API