Legal Opinion

Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLP

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 2004No. CC 9708-06108; CA A107366; SC S48978PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

This case requires us to consider once again difficult issues of causation and foreseeability in tort law. We are asked to decide whether defendant, an accounting firm, may be held liable for damages suffered by plaintiff, its client, due to changes in the market price of plaintiffs stock that defendant’s negligent conduct did not cause. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and the Court of Appeals reversed. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLP, 176 Or App 317, 31 P3d 1092 (2001). We allowed review and, for the reasons that follow, reverse the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Stewart v. Jefferson Plywood CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Chapman v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Joshi v. Providence Health System of Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Piazza v. KellimOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Ventas, Inc. v. HCP, INC.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API