Legal Opinion
Foraker v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 17, 2018No. Case No. 3:14-cv-87-SIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Peggy Foraker ("Foraker") moves for summary judgment on her claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Defendant USAA Casualty Insurance Company ("USAA") responds that Foraker's motion is not supported by the facts of this case, the Court's earlier rulings in this case, or Oregon law. For the following reasons, Plaintiff's motion is denied.
STANDARDS
A. Summary Judgment
A party is entitled to summary judgment if the "movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Corvallis Hospitality, LLC v. Wilmington Trust, National AssociationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Foraker v. USAA Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Gunderson LLC v. BCG Properties Group, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Opal Labs Inc. v. Sprinklr, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Taxer v. Progressive Universal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023