Legal Opinion

Stanfield v. Laccoarce

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1980No. CA 12007, SC 26358PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiffs filed this suit to foreclose a land sale contract. Plaintiffs are the assignees of the original vendors. The primary defendants are James T. and Pauline Laccoarce, who are the original vendees (hereinafter "vendees”) and James P. and Judith Laccoarce (hereinafter "defendants”), the subpurchasers from James T. and Pauline Laccoarce. The trial court allowed plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against defendants and entered a decree of strict foreclosure. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. We granted review.

It is difficult to piece together the facts from the pleadings…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Uihlein v. Albertson's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Santilli v. State Farm Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Welch v. Bancorp Management Advisors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bodewig v. K-Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Themins v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Oregon Bank v. Nautilus Crane & Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Everts v. HoltmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API