Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
The sole issue in this case is whether the no-fault personal injury protection coverage in a motor vehicle insurance policy written to meet the requirements of ORS 743.800 includes loss of income benefits to the personal representative of a covered person who was killed in an accident. The trial court held that no such benefits were payable and entered summary judgment for the defendant. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 43 Or App 19, 602 P2d 284 (1979), and we granted the claimant’s petition for review.
Plaintiff’s decedent was a pedestrian who was killed instantly when hit by a car driven by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shadbolt v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Blalock v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Hill v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Hamrick Ex Rel. Estate of Hamrick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Ferguson v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CornellOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Great Northern Insurance v. Benjamin Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1990
- Western Fire Insurance v. WallisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.