Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Altstatt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1995No. OSB 92-17; SC S41565PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating: Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5-101(A) (failing to make full disclosure of an actual or likely conflict of interest); DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice); DR 2-106(A) (collecting an illegal fee); DR 7-106(A) (disregarding a rule of the court); and DR 7-102(A)(8) (knowingly engaging in illegal conduct or conduct contrary to a disciplinary rule). Before the commencement of the disciplinary hearing in front of the trial panel of the Disciplinary Board, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DinermanOregon Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API