In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Altstatt
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating: Disciplinary Rule (DR) 5-101(A) (failing to make full disclosure of an actual or likely conflict of interest); DR 1-102(A)(4) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice); DR 2-106(A) (collecting an illegal fee); DR 7-106(A) (disregarding a rule of the court); and DR 7-102(A)(8) (knowingly engaging in illegal conduct or conduct contrary to a disciplinary rule). Before the commencement of the disciplinary hearing in front of the trial panel of the Disciplinary Board, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DinermanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Matter of Estate of LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of StaufferOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JefferyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.