Legal Opinion

Empire Steam Laundry v. Lozier

California Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1913No. L.A. No. 2942PublishedCited by 65 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Leon F. Moss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court of Los Angeles County awarding plaintiff a perpetual injunction. The appeal is on the judgment-roll.

The facts pleaded and found are that plaintiff is a-corporatian engaged in the laundry business in the city of Los Angeles, having a large number of regular customers and a valuable and growing business. This business to-a large extent is conducted through its agents and the drivers of its wagons, who canvass from house to house soliciting orders for laundry work, collect and return the clothes. Each of these agents and drivers has a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Vulcan Detinning Co. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
  3. Witkop v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Witkop & Holmes Co. v. BoyceNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Loven v. People ex rel. Dr. Peter Fahrney & Sons Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Medtronic, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. S. Todd Gibbons, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API