Legal Opinion

Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. Martucci

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1957No. Appeals, 226-228PublishedCited by 258 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

The Central Home Furnishing Co. was engaged in the installment selling of household articles through door-to-door salesmen-collectors. Each salesman was given a confidential route of cutomers to whom he sold and from whom he collected weekly payments. The contacts between salesmen and customers were on a regular and reoccurring basis.

In February, 1955, Morgan’s Home Equipment Corporation purchased the assets of the Central Company. Of the $150,000 purchase price, only $25,000 was paid for merchandise inventory; the remainder was paid for accounts receivable,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  3. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  4. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. John Roane, Inc. v. TweedSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by258 opinions

  1. Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Victaulic Co. v. TiemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  3. Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

253 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API