Legal Opinion

Sherman v. Pfefferkorn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 8, 1922PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenney, J.

The plaintiff is now and since June, 1917, has *472been the owner of a laundry with a place of business in Weymouth and laundry routes in that town and in Hingham and Braintree. Walter E. Pfefferkorn, one of the defendants, has always lived in Weymouth and has a large acquaintance in these towns.

In the latter part of 1918, the duties of Pfefferkorn under his employment by the plaintiff were changed and his work thereafter was the collection and delivery of laundry over definite routes. No written lists of customers were given him, but the names and addresses were committed to memory from…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Consolidated Gas Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. United States v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. McCall Co. v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Marine Contractors Co. Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. All Stainless, Inc. v. ColbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  5. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API