Vulcan Detinning Co. v. American Can Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, advised by Vice-Chancellor Bergen, whose conclusions are reported in 70 N. J. Eq. Robb.) 588.
1Opinion of the Court
*389The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J.
The bill of complaint in this case was dismissed by the court of chancery upon the sole ground that the complainant did not come into court with clean hands. The facts upon which this determination rests, as stated in the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor, are briefly these: The process which it was the object of the complainant’s bill to enjoin the defendants from using or making public was the discovery of the Goldschmidt Brothers of Germany, and was as early as the year 1891 in successful operation at their factory in Essen,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- American Ass'n v. InnisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
3Cited by69 opinions
- Hyde Corporation v. HuffinesTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Universal Builders, Inc. v. Moon Motor Lodge, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Conmar Products Corp. v. Universal Slide Fastener Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.