Legal Opinion

Witkop v. Boyce

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1908PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Motion to dissolve a temporary injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This is a motion to dissolve an injunction granted ex parte, which restrained the defendant from interfering with the trade, custom or good-will of the plaintiff’s business, or making use of the knowledge or information gained from or contained in plaintiff’s original list, compilation or collection of names and addresses of customers, or from calling upon, canvassing, soliciting, accepting or filling orders for goods similar in kind to those carried by the plaintiff from the persons whose names and addresses are contained in the schedule attached to the complaint, being customers of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Tode v. . GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Magnolia Metal Co. v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Little v. GallusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Davies v. RacerNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Leo Silfen, Inc. v. CreamNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Town & Country House & Home Service, Inc. v. NewberyNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. J. L. Cooper & Co. v. Anchor Securities Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. McLaughlin v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API