Witkop & Holmes Co. v. Boyce
New York Supreme Court
Action by the Witkop & Holmes Company against Ervin G. Boyce for an injunction. A temporary injunction was granted, and defendant moves to dissolve the same.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
This is a motion to dissolve an injunction, granted ex parte, which restrained the defendant from interfering with the trade, custom, or good will of the plaintiff’s business, or making use of the knowledge or information gained from or contained in plaintiff’s original list, compilation, or collection of names and addresses of customers, or from calling upon, canvassing, soliciting, accepting, or filling orders for goods similar in kind to those carried by the plaintiff from the persons whose names and addresses are contained in the schedule attached to the complaint, being customers of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Tabor v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Stone v. GossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Tode v. . GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Magnolia Metal Co. v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- J. L. Cooper & Co. v. Anchor Securities Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- American Institute of Chemical Engineers v. Reber-Friel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- William P. Tavoulareas v. The Washington Post Company, D/B/A the Washington Post, a Delaware Corporation Appeal of Mobil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- New Method Laundry Co. v. MacCannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.