Legal Opinion
Lowrey v. Valley Forge Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 8, 1992No. 14500PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is the validity of a policy exclusion from underinsured motorists coverage1 of a motor vehicle that is owned by, or furnished or available for the regular use of, the named insured. The plaintiffs, Louise Lowrey and Sebastiana Scionti, appeal2 from the judgment of the trial court denying their application to vacate a compulsory arbitration award that denied them underinsured motorists coverage under a policy issued by the defendant, Valley Forge Insurance Company. The plaintiffs claim that: (1) the applicable regulation does not validate the policy exclusion that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Covenant Insurance v. CoonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Travelers Insurance v. KullaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Orkney v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Vitti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Serrano v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Smith v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Middlesex Insurance v. QuinnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.