Serrano v. Aetna Insurance

This appeal requires us to decide whether § 3 of No. 93-77 of the 1993 Public Acts (P.A. 93-77),1 *439which retroactively modifies the uninsured and underin-sured motorist provisions of certain automobile liabil*440ity insurance policies, comports with the United States and Connecticut constitutions. The plaintiff, Luz Ser*441rano, was insured under an automobile liability policy issued by the defendant, Aetna Insurance Company, that required her to file an uninsured or underinsured motorist claim within two years from the date of an accident. The plaintiff commenced this action for underinsured motorist…