Legal Opinion
Travelers Insurance v. Kulla
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 21, 1990No. 13885PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether an insurance policy provision limiting underin-sured motorist coverage to liability for damages arising “out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the uninsured motor vehicle,” and the regulation on which that provision is based, are contrary to the uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage statute, General Statutes § 38-175C.1 The plaintiff, The Travelers Insurance Company, denied underinsured motorist coverage to the defendant, the administrator of the estate *392of Robert Kulla. The parties submitted the issues of coverage and damages to a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. GoochSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Bodner v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Mass v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Orkney v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.