Legal Opinion

In Re Peacock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1964No. 307PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

In this jurisdiction, where a person is injured by the negligence of another, lives for a period of time and thereafter dies as a result of the injuries, his personal representative may recover (1) as an asset of the estate, damages sustained by the injured person during his lifetime, including hospital and medical expenses, and (2) for the benefit of the next of kin, the pecuniary injury resulting from death, the amounts recoverable being determinable upon separate issues. Hoke v. Greyhound Corp., 226 N.C. 332, 38 S.E. 2d 105; Hinson v. Dawson, 241 N.C. 714, 86 S.E. 2d 585. However, damages…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cole v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Cole v. . WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Bitting v. . GossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Stetson v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Sebastian v. KluttzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Sharpe v. PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Lane v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API