Legal Opinion

Cole v. Wagner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 13, 1929PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabksoN, J.

Tbe defendants’ motion was in the nature of a demurrer ore tenus on the ground that “Tbe complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” C. S., 511 (6). Tbe complaint must be liberally construed “with a view to substantial justice between the parties.” C. S., 535. Lee v. Produce Co., post, 714.

“An objection that a complaint does not state a. cause of action may be taken advantage of at any time. In such case the defendant may demur ore terms or the Supreme Court of its own motion may take notice of the insufficiency. Johnson v. Finch, 93 N. C., 205; Garrison v.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. National Trust Co. v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Porter v. RosemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Johnson v. . FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Baggett v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Harrison v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  3. Pascal Ex Rel. Pascal v. Burke Transit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. PepperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Schmidt v. Prince George's HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API