Legal Opinion

Sharpe v. Pugh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1967No. 523PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

We consider first whether the court erred in striking Paragraph XVII, quoted in the statement of facts, and the por tion of the prayer relating to recovery of damages for pain and suffering.

Simultaneously with the issuance of summons, plaintiff applied for and obtained an extension of time for filing his complaint, as authorized by G.S. 1-121. His application stated that “the nature and purpose” of his action was “(t)o recover damages from the defendant for the wrongful death of the plaintiff’s intestate, which wrongful death was caused by the negligence of the defendant in the care and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Watson v. CluttsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Bonner v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ballenger v. CrowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Fain v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Starnes v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API