Lane v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in determining that the cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations. His assertion would be correct if the action reposed in the plaintiff rather than his mother. The statute of limitations begins to run against an infant, who has no guardian at the time the cause of action accrues, upon appointment of a guardian or the removal of the age disability as provided by N.C.G.S. 1-17, whichever occurs first. Trust Co. v. Willis, 257 N.C. 59, 125 S.E. 2d 359 (1962). As Maxine Sims Swain was appointed guardian ad litem…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Wells v. . WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Congleton v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- American Trust Co. v. Catawba Sales & Processing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Holshouser v. Shaner Hotel Group Properties One Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of HollywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- DeMent v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.