Legal Opinion

Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 1, 1973No. 43PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

Defendants’ Appeal — Part I

Defendants’ Assignment of Error No. 1 is based on exceptions to the denial of their motions for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. It presents a question of law, namely, whether the evidence was sufficient to require submission to the jury. Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 157, 179 S.E. 2d 396, 397 (1971). In the consideration thereof the evidence is to be taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390, 411, 180 S.E. 2d 297, 307 (1971).

There was ample evidence to require…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  5. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. DiDonato v. WortmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Carver v. CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API