Legal Opinion

Hinson v. Dawson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 30, 1955No. 233PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Plaintiff did not separately state tbe alleged cause of action for wrongful death and tbe alleged cause of action for personal injuries between date of injury and death and property damage. While the basis for each is the same wrongful act, the causes of action are separate and distinct. Each should have been alleged as a separate cause of action. The recovery in one is distributable differently from the recovery in the other. Hoke v. Greyhound Corp., 226 N.C. 332, 38 S.E. 2d 105.

However, the trial judge clarified this confusion in the pleading by submitting, without objection, issues of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Mitchell v. . MeltsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Benton v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Table Rock Lumber Co. v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Yancey v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Smith v. MercerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Swaney v. Peden Steel CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API