Legal Opinion

Sebastian v. Kluttz

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 22, 1969No. 6919SC400PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallard, C.J.

The first question discussed by defendant in her brief concerns the assignment of error relating to the failure of the court to allow her motion for nonsuit at the close of all the evidence in the cause of action alleging alienation of affections.

These actions alleging alienation of affections and criminal conversation are actions in tort. Hardison v. Gregory, 242 N.C. 324, 88 S.E. 2d 96 (1955).

One who, without privilege to do so, purposely alienates a husband’s affections from his wife, or who has sexual intercourse with him, is liable for the harm thereby caused to her legally protected…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Matthieu v. Piedmont Natural Gas CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Railroad Co. v. Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Powell v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Cottle v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McCutchen v. McCutchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. O'NEIL v. SchuckardtIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Fitch v. ValentineMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hafner v. HafnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. Heist v. HeistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API