Legal Opinion
Wine v. Boyar
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 1963No. Civ. 26514PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.
This action was brought by two residents and taxpayers of Los Angeles County who sought to recover for the benefit of the county the sum of $413,653.08, which had been appropriated and expended for the construction of three bridges and the paving of certain streets in that portion of the San Fernando Valley known as the Platt Ranch. The parties defendant include the county, the owners of the Platt Ranch, and some others who were alleged to have participated in promoting the subdivision of the Platt Ranch. Since it serves no purpose in this opinion to distinguish between the various…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nickerson v. San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Sherman v. BuickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- County of Los Angeles v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clay v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Love v. NavarroDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967
- Porter v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Mills v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Rathbun v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973