Legal Opinion
Mills v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1968No. Civ. 24134PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
This action for declaratory and injunctive relief seeks to compel location of the Lafayette station of defendant San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) at the point specified in the ‘ ‘composite report” which preceded submission of a bond issue to the electorate, rather than at the point one and one half miles distant therefrom determined upon by the district after the bonds were voted. BART’s motion for summary judgment was granted, and demurrer of defendant County of Contra Costa was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiffs, who sue as taxpayers of the county and district,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Peery v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- O'Farrell v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- State School Building Finance Committee v. BettsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Sykes v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Sacks v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Monette-Shaw v. San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Associated Students of North Peralta Community College v. Board of Trustees of Peralta Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.