Legal Opinion
Porter v. City of Riverside
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 6, 1968No. Civ. 8676PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, Acting P. J.
The Charter of the City of Riverside was prepared by a Board of Freeholders, adopted by the electors, approved by the Legislature, and became effective in April 1953. The charter provision relating to eouncilmen’s expenses reads as follows:
“Sec. 402. Compensation; reimbursement for expenses. The members of the city council shall receive no compensation for their services as such, but shall receive reimbursement on order of the city council for council-authorized traveling and other expenses when on official duty. In addition, each member shall receive such amount as may be fixed by ordinance,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Rabkin v. DeanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- City of Santa Cruz v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Citizen Advocates, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- McDonald's Systems of California, Inc. v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.