Love v. Navarro
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER OF DISMISSAL
IRVING HILL, District Judge.
The instant action is of a type, increasingly more common, in which citizens feel themselves aggrieved by some action of local government officials and come to the Federal Court under the Civil Rights Act believing, more emotionally than rationally, that they must be entitled to a remedy here. Plaintiffs are a group of homeowners residing in the La Tuna Canyon area of the City of Los Angeles who are unhappy because the City is building a new multi-lane road near their homes. They sue the individual members of the City’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. HackettDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Floyd E. McDowell v. The State of Texas, Texas Board of Mental Health and Mental RetardationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Taylor v. NicholsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1976
- Sauls v. HuttoDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Henry Dorsey v. National Association for the Advancement of Colored PeopleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.