Legal Opinion

City of Oakland v. Garrison

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1924No. S. F. No. 11097PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent as county auditor to draw his warrant in favor of the petitioner, pursuant to a resolution adopted by unanimous vote of the board of supervisors of Alameda County, declaring that the improvement by paving the same with oil macadam of a described portion of Skyline boulevard, a public street of the city of Oakland, in which said city has the usual easement for street purposes, is of general county interest, and appropriating to the city of Oakland for such improvement the sum of five thousand dollars from the funds received…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. MacMillan Co. v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Allied Architects' Ass'n of Los Angeles v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ingram v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API