Legal Opinion
McKissack v. Comprehensive Health Services
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1994No. 96458, (Calendar No. 3)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
This is a worker’s compensation case. The hearing referee found that plaintiff Clara *60McKissack sustained a work-related disability to her left elbow, but concluded that it was not a continuing disability because she was able to return to her job as a medical technologist with defendant Comprehensive Health Services of Detroit. The Worker’s Compensation Appeal Board reversed, holding that McKissack had a continuing disability because she was not able to perform her duties adequately, and that this had led her employer to become dissatisfied and to demand her resignation.
The Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Paschke v. Retool IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Kaarto v. Calumet & Hecla, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haske v. Transport Leasing, Inc., IndianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Rakestraw v. General Dynamics Land Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Kurz v. Michigan Wheel Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- George v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE OF SOUTHFIELDMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Haske v. Transport Leasing, Inc., IndianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.