Legal Opinion

Kurz v. Michigan Wheel Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 1999No. Docket 208994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs Timothy D. Kurz and Gary Sperry appeal by leave granted from the decision of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission affirming with modifications the magistrates’ decisions holding that plaintiffs are not entitled to have their benefits calculated on the basis of their preinjury wages where components of those wages have been eliminated as a result of economic conditions and collective bargaining. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs are two of fourteen employees of defendant Michigan Wheel Corporation who returned to light-duty work after being injured on the job. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. McAuley v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Smith v. City of Detroit SwarthoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Goff v. Bil-Mar Foods, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maier v. GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Uniloy Milacron USA Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API