Legal Opinion

Kaarto v. Calumet & Hecla, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1962No. Docket 92, Calendar 49,293PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

Plaintiff was burned on the hands and face as a result of an explosion in defendant’s mine,, where he was engaged in what both parties describe as skilled employment. Workmen’s compensation benefits were paid to him voluntarily by defendant for a period of about 7 months while he recuperated from his injuries. Upon recovery, plaintiff returned to the mine and resumed his former duties, performing them satisfactorily and without significant discomfort. At the end of 14 months, defendant’s mine was shut down for economic reasons and all its employees, including plaintiff, were laid off.

Apparentl…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Levanen v. Seneca Copper CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hirschkorn v. Fiege Desk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Geis v. Packard Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Miller v. S. Fair & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Wieland v. Dow Chemical CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sington v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pelkey v. Elsea Realty & Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. White v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Medacco v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API