Legal Opinion

George v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE OF SOUTHFIELD

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2002No. Docket 212968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appealed by leave granted from an order of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (wcac) modifying the magistrate’s award to reflect a weekly benefit rate of zero. In George v Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of Southfield, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals, issued March 21, 2000 (Docket No. 212968), we reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further proceedings. In lieu of granting defendants’ application for leave to appeal, our Supreme Court remanded this matter back to us for reconsideration in light of Mudel v Great Atlantic & Pacific…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Haske v. Transport Leasing, Inc., IndianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. McKissack v. Comprehensive Health ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woodman v. WCAC MEIJER COMPANIES LTD.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API