Legal Opinion

Paschke v. Retool Industries

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1994No. 96276, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

This worker’s compensation case comes to us following a reversal of an award by the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals found that plaintiff was judicially estopped from assert*505ing his claim of total disability by previous assertions made to the Employment Security Commission that he was willing and able to work.

We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and find that plaintiff was not judicially estopped from advancing his claim. A representation made before the mesc that one is willing and able to work, in order to secure unemployment benefits, may not be used to preclude a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Storey v. Meijer, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Thomas v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Labonte v. Hutchins & WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Al-Maliki v. LaGrantMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Great Lakes Div. v. City of EcorseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API