Legal Opinion

Sobotka v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1994No. 96170, (Calendar No. 15)PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

Boyle, J.

In the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act,1 the Legislature codifies public policy applicable to, and reflective of, the political give and take of an ongoing economic struggle. Not infrequently, the forum then shifts to the judicial arena. Typically, courts are asked to construe newly enacted legislation and to supply missing pieces of the puzzle that inevitably effect the future direction of the political process. The instant case, however, involves a variation on the usual theme whose seven-year gestation period reflects the significance of the issue to interested…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Kostamo v. Marquette Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Hagerman v. Gencorp AutomotiveMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Goff v. Bil-Mar Foods, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Corl v. Huron Castings, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API