Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Richardson v. Cobb

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1901No. S.F. No. 2684PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

he defendant was appointed, by the board of supervisors, city justice of the city of San José, on the death of the incumbent, November 12, 1900, and has since continued in occupation of the office. His predecessor had previously been appointed, on the death of the original incumbent, one Gass, and prior to the appointment of defendant, November 22,1900, the board had ordered an election to fill the unexpired term, to be held November 6th of the same year. At this election the relator was elected to the office, and "qualified, but was not permitted to take possession. The suit was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Kahn v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Rauer v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People ex rel. Wood v. SandsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People Ex Rel. Murphy v. ColCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Villanazul v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Puterbaugh v. WadhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Fleming v. HanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. City of Omaha v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API