Kahn v. Sutro
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to restrain the board of election commissioners of San *319Francisco from calling an election for city and county officers at the coming general election, and from incurring the expenses attendant thereon, claiming that under the provisions of the County Government Act of March 24, 1893, as construed in the case of Hale v. McGettigan, ante, p. 112, recently decided, there can be' no election for such officers until the general election in 1898. Judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants upon a demurrer to the complaint, and the plaintiff has appealed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ex parte WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- People ex rel. Graves v. McFaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. HogeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Staude v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Popper v. BroderickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- City & County of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.