Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Murphy v. Col

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1901No. S.F. No. 2657PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. A. L. Rhodes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER,C.

—This appeal is from a judgment declaring the relator, Murphy, county auditor of Santa Clara County. At the general election held in November, 1898, one Veuve was elected county auditor of Santa Clara County for the ensuing term. On August 6, 1900, Veuve having died, and the office being vacant, the defendant was duly appointed by the board of supervisors to fill such vacancy, and qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties. On October 22, 1900, the said board made an order and issued a proclamation that at the election to be held in November, 1900, an auditor of said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Watson v. CobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
  2. Matthews v. CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. People ex rel. Lynch v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Sawyer v. HaydonNevada Supreme Court · 1865
  5. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Florida · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fish v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People Ex Rel. Richardson v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Stephens v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Ex Rel. Bridges v. JepsenNevada Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Grant and McNamee v. PayneNevada Supreme Court · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API