Legal Opinion

Moore v. . Metropolitan National Bank

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 11, 1873PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The judge erred in ordering a dismissal of the complaint against the bank. Such an order could not be properly made upon the trial of issues settled in an equity action before a jury. Upon that trial, a verdict upon all the issues as to all the parties should have been rendered, and the cause afterward heard by the court upon the verdict and other competent evidence produced by the parties, and the judgment should then be given by the court. (Birdsall v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Commercial Bank v. KortrightCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  3. Bush v. . LathropNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Ballard v. . BurgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Birdsall v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Henry v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Kempner v. HuddlestonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Moores v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of PiquaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Persky v. Bank of America National Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Greene v. . WarnickNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API