Legal Opinion

People v. Robinson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1930No. Docket No. 1562PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appellant Robinson, A. N. Jackson and W. S. Himmelright were jointly charged by an indictment with ten separate offenses of grand theft. Jackson and Himmelright entered pleas of guilty to one of the counts of the indictment and Robinson pleaded not guilty to each count. A jury found the latter guilty as charged upon nine of the counts and upon the other returned a verdict of petty theft. The appeal is from the judgments entered thereon, and the orders denying motions for a new trial.

The counts in the indictment were identical in form except as to the names of the persons whose…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Ex Parte ReggelSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Rogers v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. WeitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API