Legal Opinion

Hart v. Church

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1899No. L.A. No. 507PublishedCited by 60 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. J. W. Hughes, Judge, presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. '

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

—Plaintiff brought her action to procure the surrender and cancellation of a mortgage in the sum of five thousand dollars upon the homestead. She pleaded that in January, 1894, when she was the wife of Hart, the latter executed and acknowledged the declaration of homestead upon the premises in question. Thereafter, in January, 1895, her husband, for a valuable consideration, conveyed to her all his interest in the land, and ever since that day she has been the owner in fee thereof. She was induced by her husband to admit to her household the defendant Katharine A. Church. Katharine A. Church…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Burkett v. BurkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Gleason v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ingoldsby v. JuanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API