Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Beidleman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1915No. 7437PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; H. C. Thurman, Judge. Action by George C. Beidleman and others against Josie C. Spaulding and others. Judgment for pla;ntiffs, defendants bring error, and plaintiffs file cross pet:tion in error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs below, defendants prosecute érror, and plaintiffs below file cross-petition in error. Defendants in ■ error file motion to dismiss the appeal of plaintiffs in error, and plaintiffs in error file motion to dismiss cross-appeal of de- • fendants in error.

The motion to dismiss the appeal of plaintiffs in error must be overruled. The first ground alleged is that, the time having expired in which case-made was to be served, the court below made an additional order for further time, which order was void because the court was without power or jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers, County Treasurer v. Bass Harbour Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Vowell v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Rolater v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Moberly v. RothSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Pappe v. American Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bruner v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Wanner v. WannerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. O'Neil Engineering Co. v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Hargrave v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. King v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API