Legal Opinion

Rolater v. Strain

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 14, 1911No. 2801PublishedCited by 19 opinions

■ Error- from District Court, Oklahoma County; G. W. Clark, Judge. Action by J. B. Rolater against Mattie Inez Strain. From the judgment, Rolater brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the district court of Oklahoma county. November 18, 1910, the jury in the trial court returned its verdict, and on December 10, 1910, judgment was duly entered thereon. July 1, 1911, plaintiff in error filed his petition in error and case-made in this court. July 24, 1911, counsel for defendant in error filed their motion to dismiss the appeal, and as ground therefor assert that this court, is without jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause, for the reason that the judgment of the lower court from which the appeal is sought to be taken was rendered and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Good v. KeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Rankin v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  5. City of Davenport v. D. & St. P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Baker v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Crump v. GuyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. State Ex Rel. Osage County Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WortenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Bell v. BearmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API