Legal Opinion

Bruner v. Eaton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1926No. 16956PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

Defezidant in error, Callie Eaton, filed suit in the district court of Rogers county against the plaintiff in error, I-I. J. Bruner, and obtained judgment against hih~ for the sum of $420 alleged to be due on a rental contract. Motion for new trial was filed, overruled, and exceptions saved, and the time extended 60 days within which to! prepare and serve case-made for appeal. After the expiration of the said 60 days, the case-made not having been prepared or served, plaintiff in error filed• his application for an extension of time, alleging that he w'as prevented from securing an extension…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers, County Treasurer v. Bass Harbour Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Roberts v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. O'Neil Engineering Co. v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Spaulding v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Wanner v. WannerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. George v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Harrell v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API