Legal Opinion

Vowell v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 24, 1899PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from the District Court of Cleveland County; before James R. Keaton, District Judge. Replevin by W. T. Vowell against George Taylor and another. Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendants appealed to the district court. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

This was an action of replevin begun in the probate court of Cleveland county by W. T. Vowell against Elizabeth Taylor and George Taylor. The plaintiff recovered a judgment in the probate court, from which the Taylors attempted to appeal to the district court of said county. The judgment was rendered in the probate court on August 14, 1895, and on the 30th day of August the transcript and papers were filed in the office of the clerk of the district court. No appeal bond accompanied the papers, nor does the transcript recite that any appeal was ever taken,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wagstaff v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. St. Louis, Kansas & Southwestern Railway Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Beckwith v. Kansas City & Olathe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Dowell v. CaruthersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. Carpenter v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  3. Braden v. Gulf Coast Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Clark v. De GraffenreidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API