Legal Opinion · Dissent

King v. King

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 2005No. 99,248Published

1DissentOp Ala, J.

¶ 1 The court’s opinion reaches for decision Mother’s post-appeal plea for an appeal-related attorney’s fee but denies Father’s certiorari quest for corrective relief, which leaves undisturbed the Court of Civil Appeals’ [COCA] reversal of Father’s nisi prius change-of-custody victory. The court holds today (a) a parent demonstrating at nisi prius good cause for withholding visitation is entitled by the terms of 43 O.S.Supp.2003 § 112(D)(2)1 to an appeal-related counsel-fee award; (b) Mother is to be declared the prevailing party in the trial court because there is record proof on appeal of…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API