Legal Opinion

O'Neil Engineering Co. v. City of Lehigh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 25, 1916No. 6454PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Atoka County; Robt. M. Rainey, Judge. Action by the city of Lehigh against the O’Neil Engineering Company and the Southern Surety Company. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CAMPBELL, C.

The defendant in error has filed in this court its motion to dismiss the appeal herein, and the plaintiffs in error have filed a motion for permission to withdraw the case-made for correction. The ground upon which a dismissal is urged is that the case-made was not served within time. Under the record as it exists in this court, such contention is true for the reason that the case-made fails to affirmatively show that the orders of the trial court, extending the time for service of case-made, were entered of record in the trial court as required by law; but it is made to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers, County Treasurer v. Bass Harbour Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Spaulding v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Grayson v. DammeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bruner v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Argentoes v. Fidelity Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Seibold v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Wanner v. WannerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Hargrave v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API