Legal Opinion

Marr v. Southern California Gas Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 8223PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Commencing May 10, 1922, proceedings were taken under the statute (Stats. 1915, p. 99, as amended Stats. 1919, p. 670) for the formation of Municipal Improvement District No. 6 in the city of Glendale and for the issuance of $50,000 in bonds of the district to acquire or construct works for supplying the people of the district with gas. The proceedings were completed and the bonds were authorized, issued and sold to the respondent William R. Staats Company and were by them resold to the interveners prior to the commencement of this action. The appellant, a resident and taxpayer within the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Mulville v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Berkey v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. FeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Maine School Administrative District No. 15 v. RaynoldsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. People v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Dobyns v. CheshireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. California Standard Finance Corp. v. Bessolo & Gualano, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API