Dobyns v. Cheshire
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCrail, J.
This is an appeal on the judgment roll alone from a judgment against appellant after an order sustaining a demurrer, without leave to amend, to appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus alleging the illegality of a tax which had been levied by the city of Pasadena. Appellant says “the fundamental problem is whether a tax levy for one year under the Municipal Improvement District Act of 1915 can include delinquencies in the collection for the prior year”. Appellant contends the answer should be a negative one. However, the question is more accurately stated in the following form: Is a tax,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- East St. Louis v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hughson v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Stevens v. TrumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Perrin v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Irvine v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wallace v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Irvine v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Kahn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.