Legal Opinion

Dobyns v. Cheshire

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1935No. Civ. 10482PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, J.

This is an appeal on the judgment roll alone from a judgment against appellant after an order sustaining a demurrer, without leave to amend, to appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus alleging the illegality of a tax which had been levied by the city of Pasadena. Appellant says “the fundamental problem is whether a tax levy for one year under the Municipal Improvement District Act of 1915 can include delinquencies in the collection for the prior year”. Appellant contends the answer should be a negative one. However, the question is more accurately stated in the following form: Is a tax,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. East St. Louis v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Municipal Improvement Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hughson v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Stevens v. TrumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Perrin v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Irvine v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Wallace v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Irvine v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kahn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API