Legal Opinion

Mulville v. City of San Diego

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1920No. L. A. No. 5565PublishedCited by 31 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

Plaintiff, as a resident, voter, and taxpayer in municipal improvement district No. 1, of the city of San Diego, instituted this action for the purpose of enjoining the issuance and sale of certain bonds of said improvement district and of having all proceedings in relation to the organization of the district and the issuance of the bonds canceled and declared null and void.

Proceeding under the provisions of chapter 79 of the statutes of California of 1915, page 99, the common council of the city of San-Diego organized the district above referred to and the qualified electors therein voted to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Matter Appl'n Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. The People Ex Rel. Murphy v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Harden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. City of Oakland v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API