Legal Opinion

East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Garrison

California Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1923No. S. F. No. 10737PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] This is a proceeding wherein the petitioner applies for a writ of mandate directed to the respondent herein, who are, respectively, the auditor, the assessor, and the tax collector of the county of Alameda, requiring the said E.F. Garrison, as said county auditor, to compute and enter in the assessment book or books of said county, to be prepared by him in accordance with the laws governing the making and collection of property assessments and taxes for such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Willcox v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wagoner v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Cake v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Mulville v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. McDougald v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Warner Lambert Co. v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1973
  2. Pulcifer v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Uhl v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Los Angeles City School District v. Landier Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API