United States Surety Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
BLOCK, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs, United States Surety Company and American Contractors Indemnity Company, are Miller Act1 co-sureties that provided performance and payment bonds for Woodside Construction, Inc. (‘Woodside”) on its dredging contract with defendant, the United States. When Woodside was terminated for default, plaintiffs entered into a formal takeover agreement with the government and performed the remainder of the dredging contract. At issue in this case is whether plaintiffs, having completed the contract pursuant to the takeover agreement, possess a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carahsoft Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- West Bay Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Nesselrode v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.