Legal Opinion

United States Surety Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 28, 2008No. 07-638 CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

BLOCK, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, United States Surety Company and American Contractors Indemnity Company, are Miller Act1 co-sureties that provided performance and payment bonds for Woodside Construction, Inc. (‘Woodside”) on its dredging contract with defendant, the United States. When Woodside was terminated for default, plaintiffs entered into a formal takeover agreement with the government and performed the remainder of the dredging contract. At issue in this case is whether plaintiffs, having completed the contract pursuant to the takeover agreement, possess a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Carahsoft Technology Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. West Bay Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Nesselrode v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API